The most common shorashim in Chumash
Hebrew verbs and nouns ranked by how often they appear: the roots that occur 500 times and up, then 200 to 500, then 100 to 200. Print it and put it where your child learns.
Pick one to jump straight to its videos, PDFs and printables.
Rabbi Yakov Horowitz walks you through the building blocks of Chumash learning in 36 minutes: shorashim, prefixes and suffixes, and how to help with homework without doing it for your child.
36 minutes (two places to watch, in case one is filtered on your device)
Every slide from the video, 58 pages. Print it or keep it open while you watch.
58 pages · PDF
More than nine in ten words in the Chumash are variations of only 270 root words. Teach a child those roots and the language opens up. Here is what that looks like on the page:
Bereishis 12:1 · Parshas Lech Lecha בְּרֵאשִׁית י״ב:א׳
Tap a word
Hebrew verbs and nouns ranked by how often they appear: the roots that occur 500 times and up, then 200 to 500, then 100 to 200. Print it and put it where your child learns.
A short introduction to the thinking behind Chumash Workbook Vol. I, and what changes when a child is taught the structure of the language first.
The companion piece, on Chumash Workbook Vol. II and the Shoreshland game that turns root-word practice into something children ask to do.
55 minutes on what a beginner actually needs: the vocabulary of the shakla v'tarya, how a sugya is built, and how to sit with your child over a blatt without either of you losing the thread.
55 minutes (two places to watch, in case one is filtered on your device)
All 39 pages of slides from the video, including the timeline of the Tannaim and Amoraim.
39 pages · PDF
The Gemara terms from Brachos Volume I as two-sided cards. Print them, cut along the guides, and each card has the Hebrew on one face and the plain English on the other. The quickest way to drill vocabulary before a shiur.
Every term in the Eilu Metziyos workbook, numbered and grouped by the lesson it first appears in, with the English meaning alongside. The whole book in four pages, so it doubles as a checklist of what your child has covered so far.
Ben Rothke reviews the Gemara workbook in The Times of Israel: how the book paces a beginner through roughly 100 core Talmudic terms, and why he thinks educators would be remiss not to look at it.
Rabbi Horowitz made the case for skills-based learning across three columns in Mishpacha in 2007.
Imagine being asked to master the Rambam's writings in the original Arabic over ten years. Would you spend the first months learning Arabic, or open the Moreh Nevuchim on day one and hope to pick the language up along the way? Our sons are handed the second plan.
Kids don't drop out in tenth grade. They fall behind in the fifth and sixth grades. And they never catch up.
Remedial rooms and at-risk yeshivos already teach skills, carefully and patiently, with the right tools. The question this column asks is why a child has to fall first in order to be taught that way.
We seem to be offering our children a significant array of learning assistance and support after some form of educational failure has occurred.
The column that lays out the two roads: teach each pasuk by memory, or teach the structure of the language and let the child assemble the rest. This is where the 270-roots figure at the top of this page comes from.
More than 90 percent of all words that appear in Chumash are variations of only 270 root words.
By Ilan Preskovsky
A magazine feature on how Bright Beginnings came about, including the car ride to the airport that changed how Rabbi Horowitz taught.
Support Bright Beginnings
If you appreciate and/or benefit from our Bright Beginnings educational content, and our Child Safety content, please consider supporting our work by donating to Bright Beginnings using this Stripe link:
Donate to Bright BeginningsSecure payment handled by Stripe.
Buying for a yeshiva or a school? Educational bulk and wholesale discounts are available. Write to publications@thebrightbeginnings.com.
Mishpacha · Chinuch Matters · 5 Shevat 5767 · 24 January 2007
It is rare to find a single “smoking gun” clearly identifiable cause, to explain why a child regresses from the “inner circle” of successful students to the “outer ring” of uninspired learners, and perhaps even to those who, Rachmana latzlan, sink into the morass of at-risk behaviors. After all, there are a huge range of non-educational factors, parenting and social/emotional issues, that often play a significant role in a child’s success in school. Having said that, I think that we would all agree that we have a sacred obligation to reflect upon, and seek the counsel of our gedolim, as to the most effective way to be mechanech our children so that they all reach their fullest potential.
While much attention is focused on the teen years, when many at-risk children begin exhibiting symptoms of distress, I strongly feel that in many instances the slide began far earlier, when children failed to acquire the basic skills they desperately need to achieve success. In order to illustrate the point, please permit me to present the following scenario:
Imagine that you received an offer from a generous benefactor to head a group of kollel yungerleit in learning the writings of the Rambam in their original Arabic over a period of ten years. You would love to take the assignment, but there is one slight problem. You don’t understand a word of Arabic. Your prospective donor tells you not to worry. He informs you that he is confident that you will master the language and bring new insight to the timeless works of the Rambam.
Assuming that you accepted the offer, how would you go about designing the ten-year program?
Well, there are basically two paths that you could choose. One would be to take the strategic route. You would designate significant blocks of time at the onset to carefully and methodically study Arabic. After all, how could you possibly understand the basic text of the It Doesn’t Start in Tenth Grade Rambam’s works, let alone the nuances of his every word without a thorough understanding of the language? You would look high and low for the best Arabic-English dictionary money could buy and keep it at your side at all times.
Perhaps you would consult with an expert in learning foreign languages. You might be advised to proceed slowly, as learning a foreign tongue is often frustrating, and there is significant danger of “burnout” if you progress too quickly at the beginning of the program. Additionally, you may decide to set a long-term goal of mastery of all topics that the Rambam draws on regularly in his writings, Chumash, halachah, and all portions of Neviim and Ksuvim.
There is a second and far simpler route that you could take. You could simply jump in headlong and begin reading the Rambam’s classic Morei Nevuchim (Guide to the Perplexed; a very deep and difficult philosophical sefer written by the Rambam) in Arabic the very first day. As far as the language barrier, no big deal! You figure that you will pick up Arabic as you go along. After all, you are a bright fellow and you already speak Hebrew, English, and Yiddish. It can’t be difficult to learn another language, can it? You figure that the longer you keep at it, the better you will get at Arabic.
Reading these lines, which of the two programs described above do you think will result in a greater chance for success? The first or the second? The slow-and-steady approach or the readyor-not-here-I-come one? Who do you think will reach the finish line first, let alone healthy and well adjusted, the tortoise or the hare?
Well, if you think about it, our preteen sons are in a very similar situation to that of the fictional program described above. Our sons have a ten-year “fellowship” program, during which we hope that they will master the intricacies and timeless beauty of Gemara. The best way to achieve that lofty goal is a question of approach and methodology. What type of program will allow our children to thrive and reach the finish line having mastered, appreciated, and developed a lifelong love for Gemara and learning? A slow, skill-based, balanced approach or a hurry-up program that will teach them “a lot” but not that well?
This is not a “new” discussion. Read through the writings of the Maharal and others on this topic and you will discover that they suggested a methodical and systematic approach to mastery of Tanach and Gemara hundreds of years ago. (More on this in the next column.)
In these challenging times, when not “making it” in yeshivah translates into squandered childhoods, unrealized potential, and often a complete abandonment of Yiddishkeit, we would do well to make a serious communal cheshbon hanefesh and decide if the hora’as sha’a extenuating circumstances, of the climate nowadays mandates that we slow down the pace a bit and properly prepare our children with the skills they will need to succeed.
Kids don’t drop out in tenth grade. They fall behind in the fifth and sixth grades. And they never catch up.
By Rabbi Yakov Horowitz. First published in Mishpacha.
Mishpacha · Chinuch Matters · 19 Shevat 5767 · 7 February 2007
It was a few days after Rosh HaShanah 5756 (1995), and we had just arrived home from the hospital after the birth of our youngest child. After we put our older children to bed, my wife and I were enjoying some “quality time” with our baby. At one point, my wife, who has the uncanny ability to read my thoughts, asked me to explain that faraway look in my eyes. I sheepishly admitted that I was calculating how old I would be when the time would come for me to remove the training wheels from Sara’s bicycle and run alongside her until she could successfully ride without falling (I was about forty-two when the training wheels came off, if you must know, and that phase has mercifully passed).
Training wheels are a remarkable invention. Once they are properly affixed to a child’s bicycle, he or she only needs them for a short period of time. Once the child acquires better balance and agility on a bicycle, the training wheels are lifted a bit. Then a bit more. Soon, they are removed completely and the child never looks back. You know what they say, “You never forget how to ride a bicycle.”
I think that this analogy of bicycle riding and training wheels carries profound lessons for us as we chart a course for the chinuch of our precious children in these challenging times. If one takes a few steps back and surveys the overall landscape of how we impart Torah to children and adults, one might be struck by a puzzling dichotomy. We seem to be offering our children a significant array of learning assistance and support after some form of educational failure has occurred. However, very few of these tools are offered to children who are in the critical “training-wheels” phase of their learning experience.
Going back to the bicycle analogy, that would seem like having our children start riding their bicycles without the benefit of training wheels, only providing them to those who severely injure themselves by repeatedly falling off their bicycles.
Think about it. If a child is falling behind in his/her learning, we place him/her in a remedial program. There, a skill-based educational approach is taken; where children are given more time to acquire the skills they will need to succeed. This phenomenon is even more pronounced in “at-risk-teen” yeshivos, where all sorts of educational and motivational techniques are employed to help the young adults appreciate Torah learning. If a grown man finished his years in yeshivah without having mastered Gemara learning, it is perfectly appropriate, and culturally acceptable, to make use of an ArtScroll Gemara, replete with nekudos (vowels), translation, and learning tools, such as charts and diagrams that work so well with visual learners.
I am most certainly not suggesting that we start teaching Chumash and Gemara to our children using ArtScroll seforim. What I do recommend is that we invest the time to teach children properly in their formative years so that they have the tools to succeed and develop a lifelong love for learning Hashem’s Torah.
Take the limud of the Chumash, for example. More than ninety percent of all words that appear in the Chumash are variations of only 270 root words! There are 26 verbs (i.e. yatza, holach) and 38 nouns (i.e. lechem, makom) that appear in the Chumash more than 500 times each! If we were to give children a rudimentary understanding of lashon hakodesh, teach them the shorashim and shimushim (root words, prefixes, suffixes, etc.) before or as soon as they start learning Chumash, we would be providing them with the chinuch “training wheels” they need to succeed.
This is not a “new” concept. Even a casual reading of Rashi’s timeless commentary on the Chumash reveals how critical lashon hakodesh skills are in mastering Chumash. It is impossible to understand Rashi’s commentary, let along his nuances, without these skills.
Ironically, many or most girls’ schools have been teaching Chumash using the skill-based approach for decades. However, many or most mainstream boys’ schools do not employ these methods. Schools for at-risk boys do, as do the resource-room programs in mainstream schools, but not the regular classes.
As I mentioned in the previous column, these critical skills are even more essential in the learning of Gemara, where Aramaic is introduced, nekudos (punctuation marks) are removed, and the nature of lengthy Gemara logic threads is such that a few missed key words in the opening lines of a shiur (lesson) can result in many days of frustration and underachievement until a new Gemara topic is introduced.
In the broader scheme of things, we are only discussing a minor investment of time in the formative years of the chinuch of our precious children to provide them with these critical educational training wheels. In today’s challenging climate, we must do all we can to teach them slowly, carefully, and well while they are young and eager to learn.
Because the road they will need to ride is far more dangerous than was ours. The downhill slopes are much steeper, and the boulders on the sides of the path are getting larger every day.
By Rabbi Yakov Horowitz. First published in Mishpacha.
Mishpacha · Chinuch Matters · 4 Tammuz 5767 · 20 June 2007
More than 90 percent of all words that appear in Chumash are variations of only 270 root words! There are twenty-six verbs (ex. yatza, halach) and thirty-eight nouns (ex. lechem, makom) that appear in Chumash more than 500 times each! If we were to give children a rudimentary understanding of lashon hakodesh (Hebrew), i.e., teach them the shorashim and shimushim (root words, prefix, suffix, etc.), before or as soon as they start learning Chumash, we would be providing them with the chinuch “training wheels” they need to succeed.
These lines were taken from the “Training Wheels” column that appeared in this space, making the case for the need to teach our children critical skills during their entry level to new topics such as Chumash and Gemara. Permit me to explain:
There are basically two ways to teach Chumash to beginners (the same concept applies to Gemara, albeit with modifications for Gemara terms and phraseology). One approach is to teach by memory/rote. In this method, when a new pasuk is taught, each word is translated to the child. The children then repeat the pasuk and translate the words in the timeless singsong tune passed down through the generations. This is primarily a memory-based exercise, where the children retain the words they are taught, all the while building a growing vocabulary of words that they have already memorized.
The other approach is a skill-based one. This method is based on the notion that children ought to first (or simultaneously) be taught the basic structure of lashon hakodesh. They are introduced to the meaning and usage of the main shorashim, root words, and shimushim, prefixes and suffixes, that are used to conjugate the root words.
If you are a regular reader of these lines, you know by now that I am a strong proponent of the slow-and-steady skill-based method, as I feel that this is the proverbial concept of “teaching a child how to fish.” Investing the time to teach our sons and daughters the skills that they will need to succeed is the greatest gift we can afford them. For a skill-based approach to chinuch results in independent learners who have the tools to enjoy the exploration of the various limudim they engage in.
Rote learning, on the other hand, requires an enormous amount of memorization and only works well for children for whom committing large amounts of material to memory comes very easily. Additionally, the rote process is often difficult for creative children, for visual learners,1 and for restless/distractible children. Finally, it leaves many children, as well as adults, with a great volume of knowledge, but not necessarily the ability to connect the dots and form an understanding of the Hebrew language that will allow them to open a Chumash and read a Ramban with ease.
Why is that so? Well, please permit me to share an analogy with you. Think of the last time that you attended a family wedding. There, you may have been introduced to a distant relative for the umpteenth time. Somewhere in the recesses of your mind, you know that he is related to you somehow. The only problem is that you just are not quite sure how that connection is made. (Your father’s brother’s cousin through marriage? Or was it your father’s cousin’s brother-in-law?) It may be exceedingly frustrating for you not to be able to figure this out, but you just can’t seem to get your mind around it no matter how hard you concentrate and/or how many times you have gone through this frustrating exercise.
Well, my dear reader, that is what it is like for a child (or adult) who learned Chumash by rote to try and figure out the connection between vayomer, vatomer, amarti, leimor, imri, vayomru, amru, amar, amarnu … you get the picture. They know that these words are interlinked somehow, (all derive from the root word “amar”), but they just don’t know exactly how the LEGO pieces of the Hebrew language click together. So, rather than memorizing several hundred shorashim, the rote learner must memorize many thousands of the cousins, uncles, and aunts of these root words.
Some are under the impression that children will pick up the language as they continue to learn and memorize more words. But that is not the way complex languages are taught. Just think back to your school days and all those color-coded posters in your classrooms charting the creation of blended words, for example: can + not = cannot or can’t. Those charts, the lessons you were taught, and all the exercises in your grammar workbooks gave you a mental map of how those words were formed. If this is the case in the English language, it is all the more so with lashon hakodesh where root words and the almost infinite permutations they form with the various prefixes and suffixes are the very core of how it all pulls together.
This sounds quite logical, doesn’t it? So, why aren’t all our children2 learning this way? As I see things, there are three main reasons: 1) The notion that teaching skills is somehow a departure from our mesorah, tradition; 2) the thinking that investing the time to teach skills will result in diminished quality and/or quantity of learning; and 3) relentless, unbearable pressure from parents (that’s you) on school principals to “cover ground,” or have their schools relegated to second-tier oblivion.
I will address all three of these concerns in future columns. Stay tuned.
By Rabbi Yakov Horowitz. First published in Mishpacha.
By Ilan Preskovsky
While the Tanach may be the bedrock and “point of departure” for Judaism as both a religion and a culture, it is the Talmud, especially the Babylonian Talmud (the Talmud Bavli), that is the best encapsulation of how Jews for the past two-thousand-odd years have related to the Torah and, thus, how we have lived as Jews.
The Talmud Bavli was compiled in the sixth century CE (the less-used Jerusalem Talmud, the Talmud Yerushalmi, was compiled about a hundred years prior) and collected the thoughts, teaching and arguments of the great Jewish rabbis of the previous six centuries. Comprised of the Mishna (itself compiled in 190 CE by Rabbi Yehuda Hanasi) and the Gemara, the commentary on the Mishna by the rabbis who came after it, the Talmud has been at the heart of Jewish learning ever since.
The bulk of the Talmud deals primarily with halachic matters, usually in the form of debates between rabbis and rabbinic schools, but these legal arguments are also often interspersed with what is known as Agadata: an apparently chaotic swirl of thoughts and opinions on everything from philosophy to mysticism, psychology to history, mythology to social criticism. One of the most profoundly brilliant aspects of the way the Talmud was compiled and presented is that, despite the fact that the rabbis of the Talmud often lived centuries and many miles apart, it presents these arguments as if they are happening between contemporaries. This gives it both a sense of immediacy and timelessness by creating the illusion of great scholars sitting eye-to-eye in yeshiva, arguing over the tiniest details of biblical exegesis and halachic minutiae, in the way that talmidim have been doing ever since.
It is a text that, over the first few centuries after the destruction of the second Temple and our expulsion from the land of Israel, radically reformed Judaism by doing the unthinkable and turning the oral Torah into a frozen, largely unchanging text, while at the same time transforming a religion built around the physical Temple into something built around the metaphorical Temple of our mind, a Temple that Jews could carry with us wherever we happened to find ourselves in the world, and the key to our continued survival.
Aiming to capture some of the freewheeling and fluid nature of the Oral Torah in written form (an impossible attempt but a crucial one), the Talmud is, by the standards of a traditional legal text, a supreme mess, as it jumps with abandon from topic to topic, even genre to genre, with seemingly neither rhyme nor reason. Rather than a failing, though, this “messiness” is at the very heart of the Talmud's enduring resonance throughout the centuries. As Rabbi Dr. Nathan Lopes Cardozo puts it, and I paraphrase: because of the way it is structured, going from in-depth legalistic discussion to profound philosophical ideas to nuggets of relationship advice, the Talmud represents nothing less than life itself.
This preamble should, I hope, give some idea of the supreme importance of the Talmud to Jews of all stripes throughout the past two millennia, but it should also make fairly clear the challenges inherent in learning it.
Talmud study makes up some 90% of the curriculum in any yeshiva (and a continuously increasing role in some seminaries too, as the past century has seen a groundswell of support for girls and women learning Talmud), and is the focus of all Jewish day schools where post-matric yeshiva attendance is expected or at least highly desired. At these schools, the switch from a focus on Chumash and/or Mishna study to a full-on immersion in Talmud happens anywhere between the ages of ten and thirteen. This is, if you stop for a second to think about it, fairly mind-boggling, but is something we take for granted because of just how central a part the Talmud plays in the life of any religious Jew and just how much passion so many have for it.
While secular subjects are very much tailored according to the age, maturity and learning levels of not just each grade but often to numerous sub-groups within each grade, when it comes to religious studies our expectations are amazingly different. Thirteen- and fourteen-year-old boys, and increasingly girls, are thrown head-first into studying something that was written fifteen hundred years ago, mostly in a long-dead language (the Mishna is written in relatively more familiar post-biblical Hebrew, but the Gemara is written in archaic Aramaic), and with almost no punctuation. And that is just the formal aspects of it. It is a bewilderingly difficult text to get one's head around, all the more so as it deals with subjects that are often esoteric to your average 21st-century teenager, but we expect our kids to “just go with it” in a way that we would never dream of doing with secular subjects.
This is not, Heaven forbid, a knock on the Talmud or its centrality to Jewish religious education. I have hopefully already made clear by now why the Talmud is so invaluable to post-second-Temple Judaism. We do, however, sometimes need a bit of perspective on something that we take all too easily for granted but is, ultimately, just a stone's throw away from teaching Aristotle in the original Ancient Greek to ten-year-olds.
Rabbi Yakov Horowitz, an educator in Monsey, New York, during the course of his years teaching Gemara to eighth-grade boys, came to the realization that he, like so many rebbeim, was guilty of taking exactly that for granted. At least one-third of his students were not grasping even the most basic aspects of Talmud study, despite having spent two to three years studying Gemara in previous years. Here, in this notably frum suburb of New York, a good portion of his students would go through their entire childhoods and adolescences in schools that place a particularly strong emphasis on Torah study but, at the end of the day, would graduate without the “basic abilities to learn even a single blat of Gemara.”
Rabbi Horowitz came gradually to realize this huge gap between his expectations of his students and the grim reality, but it was crystallized for him under the most extraordinarily mundane of circumstances. On a certain occasion, he found himself on a 45-minute car ride to an airport with a small group of carpet makers who, throughout the journey, were talking endlessly among themselves about their specific craft, laughing at in-jokes that only they would get. Their intention was not, presumably, to alienate the rabbi among them, but the result nonetheless left him feeling utterly bewildered and isolated throughout that forty-five-minute drive. The realization that this is exactly what many of his students must feel, day in and day out, for hours at a time, hit him with the full force of the greatest epiphanies. The next day at school he “addressed the students, begging them to forgive him,” and from that day on his teaching style shifted drastically. He threw all assumptions out of the window about where his students were holding and, along with discussing the basics of each subject before going into it, he created an open and inviting space for his students to ask any question they wanted on what they were learning, no matter how seemingly basic.
No longer interested in getting through as many pages of Gemara in as little time as possible, Rabbi Horowitz slowed things right down and started to concentrate heavily on teaching his students the language of the Talmud so that, though they might get through less Gemara with him, they would finally be equipped to actually study it, with relative ease (as easy as Talmud study can ever get), on their own, with chavrusas, and throughout the rest of their lives. It would also turn something that they were supposed to love into something that they actually would love.
He inevitably received some pushback from parents who had their own ideas about how Gemara learning was supposed to go, but Rabbi Horowitz would sit down with both parents of new students and those he had been teaching a while, and patiently explained why his open, back-to-basics approach would benefit their children immensely. Ultimately, Rabbi Horowitz was proven entirely right, as his new methods resulted in major changes in his students, igniting a newfound passion for Talmud and ensuring that even those who once struggled in his class were able to come to grips with a page of Gemara.
Along with the none-more-crucial step of slowing down his classes and focusing on Talmud on a metatextual rather than purely textual level, he focused on three specific areas of Talmud study that would affect different kids differently, and started to grade them on these three areas individually rather than as a single mark. Specifically, to learn a page of Talmud on even the most basic level, three skills are required: an ability to read without punctuation, an ability to translate Aramaic and old Hebrew, and an ability to follow the flow of the Talmud's very particular form of logic. One builds on the next, to be sure, but he immediately noticed that some students who had great difficulty following the structure of the Gemara's logic were quite easily able to translate the text and read it fluently without punctuation, while other students could just as easily do the precise opposite.
With his new teaching style more than proving itself a wild success, Rabbi Horowitz started to put plans into place for a book that would spread his unique but very elemental approach to Talmud education to not just young high school students but anyone starting to learn Gemara for the first time. He fully acknowledges the way that something like ArtScroll's series of translated, commentated Gemaras has made great inroads in making the Talmud accessible to even the newest learners, but he wanted his book to work as a companion to ArtScroll by specifically focusing on giving new learners the tools to become independent Gemara scholars, intimately familiar with the inner workings of any page of Talmud.
Rabbi Aron Spivak, a former student of Rabbi Horowitz who was initially brought into his yeshiva to teach those who were struggling with their learning, would write the book while Rabbi Horowitz himself handled its editing and production. With Rabbi Spivak's compassionate, fluid writing in tow, Rabbi Horowitz began to piece together what would become a short introductory book to the Talmud as a whole, called Bright Beginnings: Hachana L'Gemara, and a two-volume teaching guide to tractate Brachos, entitled Bright Beginnings Hascholas Gemara Brachos Workbooks, Volumes I and II. These books started life as black-and-white printed sheets, but after years of road testing they were released in fully illustrated, brightly coloured and elaborately produced textbooks that would make the study of Talmud as accessible as humanly possible.
Within these pages, Rabbi Spivak breaks down each page of Gemara into smaller, more manageable “bites,” providing translation, punctuation and test questions on each section, and providing a systematic overview of what each bite is saying and, more crucially, how it goes about saying it. These books, which are a follow-up to similar introductory guides to Chumash, have already sold in their thousands as hard copies to 200 yeshivas throughout the world.
This feature also profiles Rabbi Dovid Newman's Vhaarev Na programme and its eight-step approach to chazara. That section is not reproduced here.
By Ilan Preskovsky.